Aurora Solar vs Solargraf
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, integrations, and use-case fit.
Aurora Solar
The market-leading AI solar design and sales platform
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Aggregate rating
- 4.5 / 5
- Best team size
- 5-500
- Free trial
- No
Solargraf
Solar design and proposal software, deeply integrated with the Enphase ecosystem
- Starting price
- From $233/mo
- Aggregate rating
- —
- Best team size
- 1-50
- Free trial
- No
Quick verdict
Aurora Solar: Residential and light-commercial solar contractors that want the deepest, most accurate AI design and proposal platform and can absorb premium, contact-sales pricing.
Solargraf: Residential solar sales teams and installers — especially those selling Enphase IQ batteries and microinverters — who want fast, financeable, e-signable proposals.
Decision matrix — which one is right for you?
Pick Aurora Solar if…
- → Your situation matches Aurora Solar's target profile: Residential and light-commercial solar contractors that want the deepest, most accurate AI design and proposal platform and can absorb premium, contact-sales pricing
Pick Solargraf if…
- → Your situation matches Solargraf's target profile: Residential solar sales teams and installers — especially those selling Enphase IQ batteries and microinverters — who want fast, financeable, e-signable proposals
- → QuickBooks is critical — Solargraf has native integration; Aurora Solar requires Zapier or manual workarounds
Pricing side-by-side
| Tier | Aurora Solar | Solargraf |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Contact sales — Custom | Starter — Custom |
| Tier 2 | — | Small Business — Custom |
Aurora Solar uses custom-quoted pricing (typically $250-$800/user/mo for enterprise FSM platforms); Solargraf has transparent public pricing starting at $233/mo. If budget predictability matters, Solargraf wins on transparency alone. If you need enterprise-tier features and don't mind the sales process, Aurora Solar's custom pricing reflects the deeper feature set.
Pros & cons
Aurora Solar
- + 13 years of product maturity (founded 2013)
- − No public pricing (contact-sales only)
- − Can be expensive for small shops
- − Lacks permit-ready electrical output (single-line diagrams, wire sizing) natively — many users add AutoCAD or PVCase
- − No native QuickBooks integration (Solargraf has it)
- − No public pricing — sales call required for a quote
Solargraf
- + Native QuickBooks integration (bidirectional sync)
- − Reviewers report shading-analysis inaccuracy of roughly 10-20% versus competing tools and permit packs that need revisions more than half the time
- − Billing is annual-only, so there is no low monthly entry point
Implementation timeline comparison
Aurora Solar
3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager
Solargraf
4-8 weeks self-service or with optional paid onboarding
Enterprise-tier platforms ($250+/user/mo) typically require 3-6 months with dedicated admin time, custom pricebook setup, and phased rollout to field techs. Mid-tier platforms reach operational status in 4-8 weeks with optional paid onboarding. Entry-tier platforms are designed for self-service onboarding in 1-3 weeks. Always plan for 2-4 weeks of parallel operation with your existing system before cutting over.
Feature comparison
Only in Aurora Solar
- + production estimates
- + sales workflow
Both have
- ✓ solar design
- ✓ 3d modeling
- ✓ proposals
Only in Solargraf
- + solar proposals
- + esignature
- + financing integration
Integrations
Only in Aurora Solar
- + financing
- + crm
Both integrate with
— No common integrations —
Only in Solargraf
- + quickbooks
Which fits better in each trade
| Trade | Aurora Solar fit | Solargraf fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solar | 10 / 10 | 8 / 10 | Aurora Solar |
Vertical-fit scores combine feature coverage, customer base concentration, and the tool's own positioning for the trade. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Aurora Solar or Solargraf?
Neither is universally better — they target different buyers. Aurora Solar is best for Residential and light-commercial solar contractors that want the deepest, most accurate AI design and proposal platform and can absorb premium, contact-sales pricing. Solargraf is best for Residential solar sales teams and installers — especially those selling Enphase IQ batteries and microinverters — who want fast, financeable, e-signable proposals. See the decision matrix above for situation-specific guidance, or jump to the per-vertical winner table if you're in a specific trade.
Is Aurora Solar cheaper than Solargraf?
Both Aurora Solar and Solargraf use custom pricing or have similar entry costs — request quotes from both to compare apples-to-apples for your specific team size.
Can Aurora Solar and Solargraf integrate with QuickBooks?
Aurora Solar does not have a native QuickBooks integration (Zapier workaround may exist). Solargraf integrates with QuickBooks natively.
Do Aurora Solar or Solargraf offer a free trial?
Aurora Solar: no free trial advertised; demo on request. Solargraf: no free trial advertised; demo on request.
How long does Aurora Solar vs Solargraf take to implement?
Aurora Solar: 3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager. Solargraf: 4-8 weeks self-service or with optional paid onboarding. Implementation length scales with pricing tier — enterprise platforms ($250+/user/mo) require 3-6 months with dedicated admin time; mid-tier platforms typically reach operational status in 4-8 weeks with optional paid onboarding.
Can I migrate from Aurora Solar to Solargraf (or vice versa)?
Yes, but expect data normalization work. Customer records and active jobs typically import cleanly via CSV. Historical job data, recurring service agreements, and custom pricebooks rarely transfer perfectly — most shops leave historical data in the source system as archival reference rather than migrating it. Budget 2-4 weeks of parallel operation between the two systems during the cutover.
Aurora Solar vs Solargraf: which has better customer support?
Both Aurora Solar and Solargraf offer email support across all tiers, with phone and live chat typically reserved for higher tiers. Response time SLAs vary by tier — entry-tier customers usually get 24-48 hour email response; enterprise customers get dedicated account managers with same-day response. Read recent G2 reviews specifically for support-quality signals before committing.
Which is better for solo contractors vs growing teams?
For solo contractors and 2-3 person teams, the lower-priced option (either) typically wins on cost without sacrificing core features. For growing teams (5-15 employees), evaluate based on which platform's upper tiers include the features you'll need at your 12-18 month projected scale rather than buying for today's team size. For established 15+ employee operations, the depth of enterprise features (reporting, multi-location, marketing attribution) matters more than entry-tier price.
Need a deeper look?
See our full reviews with detailed pricing tiers, integration depth, and weaknesses.