Aurora Solar vs Scoop
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, integrations, and use-case fit.
Aurora Solar
The market-leading AI solar design and sales platform
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Aggregate rating
- 4.5 / 5
- Best team size
- 5-500
- Free trial
- No
Scoop
AI-powered field operations and workflow automation for solar and renewable-energy teams
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Aggregate rating
- —
- Best team size
- 5-500
- Free trial
- No
Quick verdict
Aurora Solar: Residential and light-commercial solar contractors that want the deepest, most accurate AI design and proposal platform and can absorb premium, contact-sales pricing.
Scoop: Solar and renewable-energy installers and O&M teams that want to standardize and automate field workflows and scale operations without adding headcount.
Decision matrix — which one is right for you?
Pick Aurora Solar if…
- → Your situation matches Aurora Solar's target profile: Residential and light-commercial solar contractors that want the deepest, most accurate AI design and proposal platform and can absorb premium, contact-sales pricing
Pick Scoop if…
- → Your situation matches Scoop's target profile: Solar and renewable-energy installers and O&M teams that want to standardize and automate field workflows and scale operations without adding headcount
- → QuickBooks is critical — Scoop has native integration; Aurora Solar requires Zapier or manual workarounds
- → You want broader feature coverage — Scoop ships 8 core features vs Aurora Solar's 5
Pricing side-by-side
| Tier | Aurora Solar | Scoop |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Contact sales — Custom | Unlimited seats — contact sales — Custom |
Both Aurora Solar and Scoop use custom-quoted pricing — typical for enterprise-tier FSM platforms. Expect 30-60 minute discovery calls from each before getting a number, with pricing in the $250-$800 per user per month range for either. Request quotes from both for apples-to-apples comparison at your specific team size and feature requirements.
Pros & cons
Aurora Solar
- + 13 years of product maturity (founded 2013)
- − No public pricing (contact-sales only)
- − Can be expensive for small shops
- − Lacks permit-ready electrical output (single-line diagrams, wire sizing) natively — many users add AutoCAD or PVCase
- − No native QuickBooks integration (Scoop has it)
- − No public pricing — sales call required for a quote
Scoop
- + Native QuickBooks integration (bidirectional sync)
- + Broad feature coverage (8 core features)
- − So configurable that setting up dashboards, reports, and workflows for each team takes time
- − It is operations/field-workflow-centric rather than a residential sales-and-design tool, so it complements rather than replaces a proposal tool
- − No public pricing — sales call required for a quote
Implementation timeline comparison
Aurora Solar
3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager
Scoop
3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager
Enterprise-tier platforms ($250+/user/mo) typically require 3-6 months with dedicated admin time, custom pricebook setup, and phased rollout to field techs. Mid-tier platforms reach operational status in 4-8 weeks with optional paid onboarding. Entry-tier platforms are designed for self-service onboarding in 1-3 weeks. Always plan for 2-4 weeks of parallel operation with your existing system before cutting over.
Feature comparison
Only in Aurora Solar
- + solar design
- + 3d modeling
- + production estimates
- + proposals
- + sales workflow
Both have
Only in Scoop
- + project management
- + workflow automation
- + scheduling
- + dispatching
- + mobile app
- + checklists
- + form automation
- + reporting
Integrations
Only in Aurora Solar
- + financing
- + crm
Both integrate with
— No common integrations —
Only in Scoop
- + quickbooks
- + zapier
Which fits better in each trade
| Trade | Aurora Solar fit | Scoop fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solar | 10 / 10 | 8 / 10 | Aurora Solar |
Vertical-fit scores combine feature coverage, customer base concentration, and the tool's own positioning for the trade. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Aurora Solar or Scoop?
Neither is universally better — they target different buyers. Aurora Solar is best for Residential and light-commercial solar contractors that want the deepest, most accurate AI design and proposal platform and can absorb premium, contact-sales pricing. Scoop is best for Solar and renewable-energy installers and O&M teams that want to standardize and automate field workflows and scale operations without adding headcount. See the decision matrix above for situation-specific guidance, or jump to the per-vertical winner table if you're in a specific trade.
Is Aurora Solar cheaper than Scoop?
Both Aurora Solar and Scoop use custom pricing or have similar entry costs — request quotes from both to compare apples-to-apples for your specific team size.
Can Aurora Solar and Scoop integrate with QuickBooks?
Aurora Solar does not have a native QuickBooks integration (Zapier workaround may exist). Scoop integrates with QuickBooks natively.
Do Aurora Solar or Scoop offer a free trial?
Aurora Solar: no free trial advertised; demo on request. Scoop: no free trial advertised; demo on request.
How long does Aurora Solar vs Scoop take to implement?
Aurora Solar: 3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager. Scoop: 3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager. Implementation length scales with pricing tier — enterprise platforms ($250+/user/mo) require 3-6 months with dedicated admin time; mid-tier platforms typically reach operational status in 4-8 weeks with optional paid onboarding.
Can I migrate from Aurora Solar to Scoop (or vice versa)?
Yes, but expect data normalization work. Customer records and active jobs typically import cleanly via CSV. Historical job data, recurring service agreements, and custom pricebooks rarely transfer perfectly — most shops leave historical data in the source system as archival reference rather than migrating it. Budget 2-4 weeks of parallel operation between the two systems during the cutover.
Aurora Solar vs Scoop: which has better customer support?
Both Aurora Solar and Scoop offer email support across all tiers, with phone and live chat typically reserved for higher tiers. Response time SLAs vary by tier — entry-tier customers usually get 24-48 hour email response; enterprise customers get dedicated account managers with same-day response. Read recent G2 reviews specifically for support-quality signals before committing.
Which is better for solo contractors vs growing teams?
For solo contractors and 2-3 person teams, the lower-priced option (either) typically wins on cost without sacrificing core features. For growing teams (5-15 employees), evaluate based on which platform's upper tiers include the features you'll need at your 12-18 month projected scale rather than buying for today's team size. For established 15+ employee operations, the depth of enterprise features (reporting, multi-location, marketing attribution) matters more than entry-tier price.
Need a deeper look?
See our full reviews with detailed pricing tiers, integration depth, and weaknesses.