Scoop Review
AI-powered field operations and workflow automation for solar and renewable-energy teams
Score
Score
WrenchStack may earn a commission if you sign up through our links, at no extra cost to you โ it never affects our rating or what we write. How we make money.
Quick verdict
Scoop is best for Solar and renewable-energy installers and O&M teams that want to standardize and automate field workflows and scale operations without adding headcount. Pricing is custom-quoted (sales call required). Strongest fit: Solar.
About Scoop
Scoop is an AI-powered field service management and workflow-automation platform that began in solar and now spans the broader new-energy world โ EV charging, wind O&M, battery storage, home energy services, and telecom. For a solar installer, its value is operational: standardized project workflows, conditional task automation, structured checklists, and centralized job tracking that keep installs and service moving without manual chasing. The scale behind it is real โ Scoop says it powers more than 250,000 job sites across 14 countries.
Users consistently credit Scoop's automations with saving hours of admin work and enabling growth without adding headcount โ the conditional action items and notification schemes let a team encode how a project should run and let the software enforce it. Its standout commercial feature is unlimited seats: office workers, technicians, and subcontractors all use it at the same price, so cost does not balloon as the crew grows.
The trade-offs are configuration effort and scope. The platform is so capable that deciding how to set up dashboards, reports, and workflows for different teams takes real time up front. And Scoop is operations- and field-workflow-centric, not a residential sales-and-design proposal tool โ so a solar company typically runs it alongside a design/proposal tool (Aurora Solar, Solargraf, Pylon) rather than instead of one. For installers and O&M teams whose bottleneck is field execution and admin overhead, Scoop is a powerful, scalable backbone.
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Unlimited seats โ contact sales | Custom quote | Entry tier |
No published number โ Scoop uses an unlimited-seats model (office staff, technicians, and subcontractors at the same price). Third-party sources cite roughly $50-100/user/mo equivalents, with advanced plans higher. Powers 250,000+ job sites across 14 countries; expanded from solar into EV charging, wind, battery storage, home energy, and telecom.
Scoop uses custom-quoted pricing โ typical for enterprise field service platforms where deployment includes data migration, training, and pricebook setup. Expect a 30-60 minute discovery call before getting a number, and the spread between quoted figures can be wide depending on your team size, vertical, and feature requirements. Always get quotes in writing and confirm what's included (number of users, integrations, support tier) before signing.
Pricing verified 2026-05-28. Vendors change pricing without notice; verify with Scoop before purchasing.
Estimate uses the published starting tier and detects per-user vs per-company pricing automatically. For an exact quote at your team size and feature requirements, request a quote from Scoop.
Key features
Integrations
Pros
- + Powerful workflow automation
Conditional action items, notification schemes, and standardized workflows let a team encode exactly how projects should run, which users say saves hours of admin and reduces dropped tasks.
- + Unlimited-seats pricing
Office staff, technicians, and subcontractors all use Scoop at the same price, so growing the team does not increase the software bill โ unusual and valuable for scaling operations.
- + Proven at large scale
Scoop powers 250,000+ job sites across 14 countries and spans solar plus EV, wind, storage, and telecom โ a sign of a mature, battle-tested operations platform.
- + Scale without adding headcount
Customers specifically credit Scoopโs automations with letting them grow without hiring more admin staff, directly improving operating leverage.
- + Standardizes field execution
Structured checklists and project tracking bring consistency and accountability to installs and O&M, reducing errors and rework in the field.
Cons
- โ Configuration takes time
The platform is highly capable and flexible, so users note it takes time to decide the best way to set up dashboards, reports, and workflows for each team. Expect an upfront configuration investment.
- โ Operations-centric, not sales/design
Scoop runs field workflows and operations, not residential sales proposals or system design. Solar companies typically pair it with a design/proposal tool rather than replacing one.
- โ No public pricing
Scoop does not publish a clean price; the unlimited-seats model is attractive but you need a quote, and third-party per-user figures are only rough proxies.
- โ Breadth can overwhelm
With so many capabilities, smaller teams may use only a fraction and still face the learning curve of a powerful platform.
- โ Best value at scale
The unlimited-seats model and automation depth pay off most for teams with real headcount and volume; a very small operation may not need this much platform.
Implementation timeline
3โ6 months for full deployment
Plan for a configuration phase: Scoopโs power comes from encoding your workflows, so invest time up front defining project stages, conditional automations, checklists, and team dashboards. Because seats are unlimited, roll it out broadly to office, field, and subcontractor users to get full value. Decide how Scoop fits alongside your design/proposal tool (Aurora Solar, Solargraf, Pylon) since Scoop handles operations, not sales. Connect QuickBooks/Zapier for accounting and integrations. Get a quote given there is no public price, and start by automating your highest-friction workflow first.
Best for / Watch out for
Best for
Solar and renewable-energy installers and O&M teams that want to standardize and automate field workflows and scale operations without adding headcount
Watch out for
So configurable that setting up dashboards, reports, and workflows for each team takes time; it is operations/field-workflow-centric rather than a residential sales-and-design tool, so it complements rather than replaces a proposal tool
Available for these trades
Top alternatives to Scoop
Matched by vertical fit, price tier, and team size โ not just rating.
Stronger solar specialty fit.
Also strong for solar.
Also strong for solar.
Cheaper at $233/mo; also strong for solar.
Has a free tier; also strong for solar.
Has a free tier; stronger solar specialty fit.
User reviews
Write a review โNo user reviews yet for Scoop
Be the first Scoop customer to share your experience. We hand-moderate every review and verify the reviewer when possible โ your input shapes what other contractors see.
Write the first review โWrite a review of Scoop
We hand-moderate every review and verify the reviewer when possible. Your review appears within 1-3 business days of submission (we email you if we need to verify). Reviews help other contractors make better decisions โ and they're the one thing G2/Capterra optimize for that WrenchStack hasn't matched yet. Your input changes that.
Frequently asked questions
What is Scoop?
Scoop is an AI-powered field service management and workflow-automation platform that started in solar and now spans EV charging, wind, battery storage, home energy, and telecom. For solar teams it standardizes and automates project and field workflows, with 250,000+ job sites across 14 countries.
How much does Scoop cost?
Scoop does not publish a clean price and uses an unlimited-seats model โ office, field, and subcontractor users at the same price. Third-party sources cite roughly $50-100/user/mo equivalents with advanced plans higher, but you should get a quote since the unlimited-seats structure changes the math.
Does Scoop do solar design and proposals?
No โ Scoop is operations- and field-workflow-centric, not a residential sales-and-design tool. Solar companies typically run Scoop for operations alongside a design/proposal tool like Aurora Solar, Solargraf, or Pylon rather than using it for proposals.
What do users like most about Scoop?
Its automation. Customers credit conditional action items and notification schemes with saving hours of admin work and letting them scale without adding headcount. The unlimited-seats pricing is also frequently praised for keeping costs flat as teams grow.
Is Scoop hard to set up?
It is highly configurable, so users note it takes time to decide how best to set up dashboards, reports, and workflows for each team. Budget an upfront configuration phase; the payoff is workflows tailored exactly to how your operation runs.
Ready to try Scoop?
Get a custom quote โ pricing is not public.
Visit Scoop โ