Aurora Solar vs Solo
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, integrations, and use-case fit.
Aurora Solar
The market-leading AI solar design and sales platform
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Aggregate rating
- 4.5 / 5
- Best team size
- 5-500
- Free trial
- No
Solo
Fast, accurate solar proposals with managed design
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Aggregate rating
- —
- Best team size
- 5-200
- Free trial
- No
Quick verdict
Aurora Solar: Residential and light-commercial solar contractors that want the deepest, most accurate AI design and proposal platform and can absorb premium, contact-sales pricing.
Solo: Residential solar sales teams that want fast, highly accurate proposals via managed design without building an in-house design team, and that prefer per-proposal pricing.
Decision matrix — which one is right for you?
Pick Aurora Solar if…
- → Your situation matches Aurora Solar's target profile: Residential and light-commercial solar contractors that want the deepest, most accurate AI design and proposal platform and can absorb premium, contact-sales pricing
Pick Solo if…
- → Your situation matches Solo's target profile: Residential solar sales teams that want fast, highly accurate proposals via managed design without building an in-house design team, and that prefer per-proposal pricing
Pricing side-by-side
| Tier | Aurora Solar | Solo |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Contact sales — Custom | Per proposal (~$29-$32) — Custom |
Both Aurora Solar and Solo use custom-quoted pricing — typical for enterprise-tier FSM platforms. Expect 30-60 minute discovery calls from each before getting a number, with pricing in the $250-$800 per user per month range for either. Request quotes from both for apples-to-apples comparison at your specific team size and feature requirements.
Pros & cons
Aurora Solar
- + 13 years of product maturity (founded 2013)
- − No public pricing (contact-sales only)
- − Can be expensive for small shops
- − Lacks permit-ready electrical output (single-line diagrams, wire sizing) natively — many users add AutoCAD or PVCase
- − No public pricing — sales call required for a quote
Solo
- − Per-proposal pricing gets expensive at high volume
- − Residential-only
- − No in-house electrical engineering
- − Monthly cost can be unpredictable since it scales with proposal volume
- − No public pricing — sales call required for a quote
Implementation timeline comparison
Aurora Solar
3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager
Solo
3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager
Enterprise-tier platforms ($250+/user/mo) typically require 3-6 months with dedicated admin time, custom pricebook setup, and phased rollout to field techs. Mid-tier platforms reach operational status in 4-8 weeks with optional paid onboarding. Entry-tier platforms are designed for self-service onboarding in 1-3 weeks. Always plan for 2-4 weeks of parallel operation with your existing system before cutting over.
Feature comparison
Only in Aurora Solar
- + solar design
- + 3d modeling
- + proposals
- + sales workflow
Both have
- ✓ production estimates
Only in Solo
- + solar proposals
- + managed design
- + financing integration
- + in app editing
Integrations
Only in Aurora Solar
— None unique —
Both integrate with
- ✓ financing
- ✓ crm
Only in Solo
— None unique —
Which fits better in each trade
| Trade | Aurora Solar fit | Solo fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solar | 10 / 10 | 8 / 10 | Aurora Solar |
Vertical-fit scores combine feature coverage, customer base concentration, and the tool's own positioning for the trade. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Aurora Solar or Solo?
Neither is universally better — they target different buyers. Aurora Solar is best for Residential and light-commercial solar contractors that want the deepest, most accurate AI design and proposal platform and can absorb premium, contact-sales pricing. Solo is best for Residential solar sales teams that want fast, highly accurate proposals via managed design without building an in-house design team, and that prefer per-proposal pricing. See the decision matrix above for situation-specific guidance, or jump to the per-vertical winner table if you're in a specific trade.
Is Aurora Solar cheaper than Solo?
Both Aurora Solar and Solo use custom pricing or have similar entry costs — request quotes from both to compare apples-to-apples for your specific team size.
Can Aurora Solar and Solo integrate with QuickBooks?
Aurora Solar does not have a native QuickBooks integration (Zapier workaround may exist). Solo does not have a native QuickBooks integration.
Do Aurora Solar or Solo offer a free trial?
Aurora Solar: no free trial advertised; demo on request. Solo: no free trial advertised; demo on request.
How long does Aurora Solar vs Solo take to implement?
Aurora Solar: 3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager. Solo: 3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager. Implementation length scales with pricing tier — enterprise platforms ($250+/user/mo) require 3-6 months with dedicated admin time; mid-tier platforms typically reach operational status in 4-8 weeks with optional paid onboarding.
Can I migrate from Aurora Solar to Solo (or vice versa)?
Yes, but expect data normalization work. Customer records and active jobs typically import cleanly via CSV. Historical job data, recurring service agreements, and custom pricebooks rarely transfer perfectly — most shops leave historical data in the source system as archival reference rather than migrating it. Budget 2-4 weeks of parallel operation between the two systems during the cutover.
Aurora Solar vs Solo: which has better customer support?
Both Aurora Solar and Solo offer email support across all tiers, with phone and live chat typically reserved for higher tiers. Response time SLAs vary by tier — entry-tier customers usually get 24-48 hour email response; enterprise customers get dedicated account managers with same-day response. Read recent G2 reviews specifically for support-quality signals before committing.
Which is better for solo contractors vs growing teams?
For solo contractors and 2-3 person teams, the lower-priced option (either) typically wins on cost without sacrificing core features. For growing teams (5-15 employees), evaluate based on which platform's upper tiers include the features you'll need at your 12-18 month projected scale rather than buying for today's team size. For established 15+ employee operations, the depth of enterprise features (reporting, multi-location, marketing attribution) matters more than entry-tier price.
Need a deeper look?
See our full reviews with detailed pricing tiers, integration depth, and weaknesses.