Enerflo vs Solo

Neither is universally better — they target different buyers. Enerflo is best for Residential solar dealers, EPCs, and vertically integrated companies that want to unify sales, design, financing, and install tracking into one lead-to-PTO workflow with flat per-company pricing. Solo is best for Residential solar sales teams that want fast, highly accurate proposals via managed design without building an in-house design team, and that prefer per-proposal pricing. See the decision matrix above for situation-specific guidance, or jump to the per-vertical winner table if you're in a specific trade.

Both Enerflo and Solo use custom pricing or have similar entry costs — request quotes from both to compare apples-to-apples for your specific team size.

Enerflo does not have a native QuickBooks integration (Zapier workaround may exist). Solo does not have a native QuickBooks integration.

Enerflo: no free trial advertised; demo on request. Solo: no free trial advertised; demo on request.

Enerflo: 3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager. Solo: 3-6 months for full deployment with dedicated implementation manager. Implementation length scales with pricing tier — enterprise platforms ($250+/user/mo) require 3-6 months with dedicated admin time; mid-tier platforms typically reach operational status in 4-8 weeks with optional paid onboarding.

Yes, but expect data normalization work. Customer records and active jobs typically import cleanly via CSV. Historical job data, recurring service agreements, and custom pricebooks rarely transfer perfectly — most shops leave historical data in the source system as archival reference rather than migrating it. Budget 2-4 weeks of parallel operation between the two systems during the cutover.

Both Enerflo and Solo offer email support across all tiers, with phone and live chat typically reserved for higher tiers. Response time SLAs vary by tier — entry-tier customers usually get 24-48 hour email response; enterprise customers get dedicated account managers with same-day response. Read recent G2 reviews specifically for support-quality signals before committing.

For solo contractors and 2-3 person teams, the lower-priced option (either) typically wins on cost without sacrificing core features. For growing teams (5-15 employees), evaluate based on which platform's upper tiers include the features you'll need at your 12-18 month projected scale rather than buying for today's team size. For established 15+ employee operations, the depth of enterprise features (reporting, multi-location, marketing attribution) matters more than entry-tier price.