Pylon Review
Fast pay-per-project solar design and proposal software with 3D shading
Score
Score
WrenchStack may earn a commission if you sign up through our links, at no extra cost to you โ it never affects our rating or what we write. How we make money.
Quick verdict
Pylon is best for Residential solar designers and sales teams who want fast proposals and award-winning 3D shading on a low-commitment pay-per-project model. Pricing starts at $0/mo. Strongest fit: Solar. 4.6 / 5 aggregate user rating.
About Pylon
Pylon is a fast, design-led solar proposal tool built around two strengths: speed and shading. It generates complete residential proposals in under two minutes, includes award-winning 3D shading analysis, and ships with a 20,000+ component library, so designers can produce an accurate, professional system layout and proposal quickly. It was voted the #1 Solar Design Tool of 2025 by Australian installers and is used globally, including in the US, with a strong 4.6/5 rating across 1,000+ G2 reviews.
Its most distinctive feature is the pricing model. Rather than a monthly subscription, Pylon charges per project โ $4 per Standard project, $10 per Pro project โ with no monthly minimum, and offers 5 free Standard projects (no credit card) to evaluate the full workflow. For a designer or small team, that means costs scale directly with how much they actually design, with zero fixed overhead and no risk to try. Reviewers specifically praise the speed and the pricing.
The trade-offs reviewers cite are customization and scope: proposal customization is limited compared with some competitors, and Pylon does not support commercial structures, so it is residential-focused. At high design volume the per-project cost can also add up versus a flat subscription. For residential solar teams that value fast proposals, strong 3D shading, and a pay-as-you-go model, Pylon is a highly-rated, low-commitment choice; teams needing deep proposal branding or commercial design should weigh those gaps.
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free (5 projects) | Custom quote | Entry tier |
| Standard | Custom quote | |
| Pro | Custom quote | Top tier |
Pay-per-project with no monthly minimum: $4 per Standard project, $10 per Pro project. 5 free Standard projects to start, no credit card required. Voted #1 Solar Design Tool 2025 by Australian installers; used globally including the US.
Pylon offers a genuinely free tier โ uncommon in this category. The free tier typically covers the basics (quoting, invoicing, sometimes scheduling) but lacks the multi-user team management, automation, and reporting depth that paid tiers add. Use it to evaluate the UX before committing, but plan to upgrade once you cross 2-3 users or need recurring service tracking.
Pricing verified 2026-05-28. Vendors change pricing without notice; verify with Pylon before purchasing.
Estimate uses the published starting tier and detects per-user vs per-company pricing automatically. For an exact quote at your team size and feature requirements, request a quote from Pylon.
Key features
Integrations
Pros
- + Very fast proposals
Pylon generates complete residential proposals in under two minutes, so designers and reps can turn around a professional system layout and quote quickly โ speed that helps close deals.
- + Award-winning 3D shading
Its 3D shading analysis is a standout, giving more credible production estimates than tools with weaker shading โ directly addressing a common pain point in solar design.
- + Low-commitment pay-per-project pricing
At $4 (Standard) or $10 (Pro) per project with no monthly minimum and 5 free projects to start, costs scale with actual design volume and there is zero fixed overhead or risk to try.
- + Strong, high-volume rating
A 4.6/5 score across 1,000+ G2 reviews โ plus being voted #1 Solar Design Tool 2025 by Australian installers โ signals broad, real user satisfaction.
- + Large component library
A 20,000+ component library means designers can build accurate systems with the specific hardware they use, rather than approximating with generic components.
Cons
- โ Limited proposal customization
Reviewers note proposal customization is limited compared with some competitors, so teams that want heavily branded or highly tailored proposals may find it constraining.
- โ No commercial structures
Pylon does not support commercial structures โ it is residential-focused. Companies doing commercial solar need a different or additional design tool.
- โ Per-project cost adds up at volume
The pay-per-project model is cheap to start but, at high design volume, can total more than a flat monthly subscription. High-volume teams should model the math.
- โ Design/proposal scope
Pylon is a design-and-proposal tool, not a full operations or customer-experience platform, so it covers one part of the solar stack.
- โ Customization vs speed trade-off
Its speed comes partly from a streamlined, less-customizable flow; teams that prioritize bespoke proposals over turnaround time may prefer a more configurable tool.
Implementation timeline
1โ3 weeks for a small team
Start with the 5 free Standard projects (no credit card) to design real systems and evaluate the full workflow before paying. Because pricing is pay-per-project, there is no subscription to manage โ but at high volume, model whether per-project costs exceed a flat-subscription competitor. Configure your common components from the 20,000+ library and set up proposal templates within Pylonโs (somewhat limited) customization. Confirm it fits your work: it is residential-only, so commercial projects need another tool. Pair Pylon (design/proposal) with your CRM and operations tools since it focuses on design.
Best for / Watch out for
Best for
Residential solar designers and sales teams who want fast proposals and award-winning 3D shading on a low-commitment pay-per-project model
Watch out for
Limited proposal customization and no support for commercial structures (residential-focused); the pay-per-project model is cheap to start but can add up at high design volume
Available for these trades
Top alternatives to Pylon
Matched by vertical fit, price tier, and team size โ not just rating.
Stronger solar specialty fit.
Also strong for solar.
Enterprise-tier upgrade path; stronger solar specialty fit.
Enterprise-tier upgrade path; also strong for solar.
Enterprise-tier upgrade path; also strong for solar.
Enterprise-tier upgrade path; also strong for solar.
User reviews
Write a review โNo user reviews yet for Pylon
Be the first Pylon customer to share your experience. We hand-moderate every review and verify the reviewer when possible โ your input shapes what other contractors see.
Write the first review โWrite a review of Pylon
We hand-moderate every review and verify the reviewer when possible. Your review appears within 1-3 business days of submission (we email you if we need to verify). Reviews help other contractors make better decisions โ and they're the one thing G2/Capterra optimize for that WrenchStack hasn't matched yet. Your input changes that.
Frequently asked questions
How much does Pylon cost?
Pylon uses pay-per-project pricing with no monthly minimum: $4 per Standard project and $10 per Pro project. It includes 5 free Standard projects (no credit card) to evaluate the full workflow, so costs scale with how much you actually design rather than a fixed subscription.
Is Pylon good for commercial solar?
No โ Pylon does not support commercial structures and is residential-focused. Companies doing commercial solar design need a different or additional tool. For residential design and proposals, it is highly rated (4.6/5 on 1,000+ G2 reviews).
What is Pylon best at?
Speed and shading. It generates complete residential proposals in under two minutes and includes award-winning 3D shading analysis plus a 20,000+ component library. Reviewers specifically praise the fast proposals and the low-commitment pay-per-project pricing.
What are Pylonโs limitations?
Reviewers cite limited proposal customization and no support for commercial structures. The pay-per-project model is also cheap to start but can add up at high design volume. Teams needing heavy proposal branding or commercial design should weigh these gaps.
Pylon vs Aurora Solar or Solargraf?
Pylon competes on speed, strong 3D shading, and pay-per-project pricing for residential design. Aurora Solar is known for engineering-grade design depth; Solargraf is sales-and-proposal-led with deep Enphase integration. Residential teams wanting fast, low-commitment design lean Pylon; those needing more customization, commercial support, or specific ecosystem fit may prefer the others.
Ready to try Pylon?
Free tier available โ no credit card required.
Visit Pylon โ